翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Dickinson-Milbourn House
・ Dickey's deer mouse
・ Dickey's Octagonal Barbershop
・ Dickey, North Dakota
・ Dickey-Stephens Park
・ Dickey-Wicker Amendment
・ Dickeya
・ Dickeya dadantii
・ Dickeya solani
・ Dickeys, Illinois
・ Dickeyville
・ Dickeyville Grotto
・ Dickeyville Historic District
・ Dickeyville, Indiana
・ Dickeyville, Wisconsin
Dickey–Fuller test
・ Dickheads
・ Dicki Chhoyang
・ Dicki Sörensen
・ Dickie (name)
・ Dickie Arbiter
・ Dickie Baugh
・ Dickie Baugh, Jr
・ Dickie Bird
・ Dickie Boon
・ Dickie Boyle
・ Dickie Brennan's Steakhouse
・ Dickie Brooks
・ Dickie Burnell
・ Dickie Burrough


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Dickey–Fuller test : ウィキペディア英語版
Dickey–Fuller test
In statistics, the Dickey–Fuller test tests whether a unit root is present in an autoregressive model. It is named after the statisticians David Dickey and Wayne Fuller, who developed the test in 1979.〔 --> | url = | format = | accessdate = }}〕
==Explanation==

A simple AR(1) model is
: y_=\rho y_+u_\,
where y_ is the variable of interest, t is the time index, \rho is a coefficient, and u_ is the error term. A unit root is present if \rho = 1. The model would be non-stationary in this case.
The regression model can be written as
: \nabla y_=(\rho-1)y_+u_=\delta y_+ u_\,
where \nabla is the first difference operator. This model can be estimated and testing for a unit root is equivalent to testing \delta = 0 (where \delta \equiv \rho - 1). Since the test is done over the residual term rather than raw data, it is not possible to use standard t-distribution to provide critical values. Therefore this statistic t has a specific distribution simply known as the Dickey–Fuller table.
There are three main versions of the test:
1. Test for a unit root:
:: \nabla y_t =\delta y_+u_t \,
2. Test for a unit root with drift:
:: \nabla y_t =a_0+\delta y_+u_t \,
3. Test for a unit root with drift and deterministic time trend:
:: \nabla y_t = a_0+a_1t+\delta y_+u_t \,
Each version of the test has its own critical value which depends on the size of the sample. In each case, the null hypothesis is that there is a unit root, \delta = 0. The tests have low statistical power in that they often cannot distinguish between true unit-root processes (\delta = 0)and near unit-root processes (\delta is close to zero). This is called the "near observation equivalence" problem.
The intuition behind the test is as follows. If the series y is stationary (or trend stationary), then it has a tendency to return to a constant (or deterministically trending) mean. Therefore large values will tend to be followed by smaller values (negative changes), and small values by larger values (positive changes). Accordingly, the level of the series will be a significant predictor of next period's change, and will have a negative coefficient. If, on the other hand, the series is integrated, then positive changes and negative changes will occur with probabilities that do not depend on the current level of the series; in a random walk, where you are now does not affect which way you will go next.
It is notable that
:: \nabla y_t =a_0 + u_t \,
may be rewritten as
:: y_t = y_0 + \sum_^t u_i + a_0t
with a deterministic trend coming from a_0t and a stochastic intercept term coming from y_0 + \sum_^t u_i, resulting in what is referred to as a ''stochastic trend''.
There is also an extension of the Dickey–Fuller (DF) test called the augmented Dickey–Fuller test (ADF), which removes all the structural effects (autocorrelation) in the time series and then tests using the same procedure.

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Dickey–Fuller test」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.